A community-driven registry for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline & more. Not affiliated with Anthropic.
Are you the author? Sign in to claim
Portable skills, agents, and templates that add Spec-Driven Development and TDD workflows to any Claude Code project. De
A Claude Code plugin that adds Spec-Driven Development (SDD) and TDD workflows to any project. Includes 16 commands, 8 agents, spec templates, and documentation.
/tdd runs RED → GREEN → REFACTOR → AUDIT via four forked subagents (tdd-test-writer, tdd-implementer, tdd-refactorer, tdd-spec-reviewer) with context isolation, a strict tdd-result YAML hand-off, and bounded retries; /implement invokes it inline per FRcode-reviewer agent (Pass 1 spec compliance, Pass 2 code quality, fail-fast) → Stage C hardening, capped before human escalation/gate-check probes (typecheck + lint + test + spec/plan/frontmatter/branch hygiene) override LLM judgmentrequireCommittableBranch; trunk-OK narrows to ci only, so chore/docs/feat cannot land on main accidentally--no-tech) — /brainstorm and /spec-write skip the technical-design + testing interviews; FR ships with needs_technical_review: true and /implement refuses until a reviewer fills it inspec-researcher Read-only Haiku subagent (invoked by /brainstorm and /spec-write via the spec-research fork) returns related FRs from active + archived specs as a fixed-shape ≤ 25-line block, no parent-context pollution/deps manages a git-tracked specs/deps.yaml manifest of sibling packages (add/edit/delete/list/sync); a deps-researcher Read-only Haiku subagent (invoked by /brainstorm and /spec-write via the deps-research fork) folds each sibling's docs/ tree into design context as a fixed-shape ≤ 25-line block, so consumer projects with several private packages stop rediscovering APIs/report-issue bundles repo state + dev narrative, scrubs secrets via 7 patterns (Anthropic / OpenAI / GitHub PAT / AWS / JWT / generic / AWS-secret), previews before publish, then posts a secret GitHub gist; the URL round-trips into /brainstorm <gist-url> for self-debug/docs stages fragments per FR (--quick), merges with human approval (--commit), or regenerates the canonical tree (--full)none; auto-claim on FR start, auto-release on archive; adapter-agnostic Provider interfacecommit-msg hook (POSIX shell by default or opt-in commitlint)/ship-milestone enforces the multi-file Release Checklist + folds staged doc fragments into the canonical tree in one commit/spec-archive for manual archival by ULID / tracker ID / M<N>, post-archive drift checks/visual-check via Chrome DevTools MCPCLAUDE.md, settings, and the commit-msg hook/plugin marketplace add nesquikm/dev-process-toolkit
/plugin install dev-process-toolkit@dev-process-toolkit
Then run the setup command in your project:
/dev-process-toolkit:setup
This detects your stack, generates a CLAUDE.md, configures settings, and optionally creates spec files — all adapted to your project.
bun must be installed. The toolkit's adapters/_shared TypeScript helpers and tracker adapters — invoked by skills via bun run — execute on bun, regardless of your own project's stack. This is a requirement of the toolkit's own machinery, not of your code: a Flutter project still gates via fvm flutter, a Python project via its own toolchain. You do not rewrite your project in TypeScript or adopt bun for your own gates.
Install bun and verify:
curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bash
bun --version
The toolkit groups its 16 user-invoked skills into a four-phase lifecycle. Read left-to-right for the full path, or jump to whichever phase matches what you're doing now.
flowchart LR
classDef spine fill:#e1f5e1,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px,color:#000
classDef secondary fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#999,stroke-width:1px,color:#555
subgraph Setup
direction TB
setup(["/setup"]):::spine
end
subgraph Plan
direction TB
brainstorm(["/brainstorm"]):::spine
spec_write(["/spec-write"]):::spine
brainstorm ~~~ spec_write
end
subgraph Build
direction TB
implement(["/implement"]):::spine
tdd["/tdd"]:::secondary
gate_check["/gate-check"]:::secondary
debug["/debug"]:::secondary
visual_check["/visual-check"]:::secondary
simplify["/simplify"]:::secondary
spec_review["/spec-review"]:::secondary
report_issue["/report-issue"]:::secondary
implement ~~~ tdd
tdd ~~~ gate_check
gate_check ~~~ debug
debug ~~~ visual_check
visual_check ~~~ simplify
simplify ~~~ spec_review
spec_review ~~~ report_issue
end
subgraph Ship
direction TB
spec_archive["/spec-archive"]:::secondary
docs["/docs"]:::secondary
pr["/pr"]:::secondary
ship_milestone(["/ship-milestone"]):::spine
spec_archive ~~~ docs
docs ~~~ pr
pr ~~~ ship_milestone
end
Setup --> Plan
Plan --> Build
Build --> Ship
Under the hood, /implement invokes the /tdd orchestrator inline per FR — /tdd forks four subagents (tdd-test-writer, tdd-implementer, tdd-refactorer, tdd-spec-reviewer) into isolated contexts and parses their tdd-result YAML hand-off. It runs gate commands inline (e.g., bun test) rather than invoking the /gate-check skill (which layers 60 probes on top of those commands), and invokes /docs --quick once per FR for the Phase 4b doc fragment. /brainstorm and /spec-write similarly fork the read-only spec-research skill (paired with the spec-researcher Haiku subagent) for topic-aware retrieval of related active + archived FRs. After self-review and human approval, /implement commits and stops — you open the PR via /pr separately. /ship-milestone invokes /docs --commit --full to fold staged fragments into the canonical docs tree before cutting the release commit.
Spine skills (bold, stadium-shaped) are the recommended invoke path; secondary skills (muted rectangles) are auxiliary tools and auto-invoked helpers.
Tracker integration (Linear, Jira, or mode: none) threads through Plan → Build → Ship: /spec-write files the FR, /implement claims it on entry and releases on success, and /ship-milestone archives the milestone group.
All commits in toolkit-managed repositories follow Conventional Commits v1.0.0, enforced locally by a commit-msg hook that /setup installs (a POSIX-shell hook by default; opt into --commitlint for projects with Node/Bun tooling).
Commands are invoked with the /dev-process-toolkit: plugin-namespace prefix in actual use; the prefix is omitted from the table for readability (matches the Agents-table convention below). The Args column mirrors each skill's argument-hint: frontmatter — surfaced here because Claude Code does not yet render argument hints in autocomplete for plugin-namespaced skills (upstream issue #43401).
| Command | Purpose | Args |
|---|---|---|
/setup | Set up SDD/TDD process for your project | [new or existing] |
/brainstorm | Socratic design session before writing specs (for open-ended features) | [--no-tech] [<feature or problem description> | <gist-url>] |
/spec-write | Guide through writing spec files (requirements, technical, testing, plan) | [--no-tech] [requirements | technical | testing | plan | all] |
/implement | End-to-end feature implementation with TDD and bounded three-stage self-review (Stage A spec compliance → Stage B two-pass delegated review: Pass 1 spec compliance, Pass 2 code quality, fail-fast → Stage C hardening) | <milestone, task description, issue number, "next", or "all"> |
/tdd | RED → GREEN → REFACTOR → AUDIT cycle | <FR-id> |
/gate-check | Deterministic quality gates (typecheck + lint + test) | [--fix to auto-fix lint issues] |
/debug | Structured debugging protocol for failing tests or unclear gate failures | <failing test, error message, or symptom> |
/spec-review | Audit code against spec requirements | [requirement-id or 'all'] |
/spec-archive | Manually archive a FR (by ULID or tracker ref) or milestone (M<N> group) via git mv into specs/frs/archive/ / specs/plan/archive/ with diff approval; runs a post-archive drift check (Pass A grep + Pass B semantic scan) on finish (FR-17, FR-21, FR-45) | <ULID, tracker ID, tracker URL, or M<N>> |
/visual-check | Browser-based UI verification via MCP | [page-path] [checklist items...] |
/docs | Generate or update project docs — staged fragments (--quick), human-approved merge (--commit), or full canonical regeneration (--full) | <--quick | --commit | --full> |
/pr | Pull request creation | [PR title] |
/simplify | Code quality review and cleanup | [focus area] |
/report-issue | Capture a structured bug report (narrative + redacted curated context, optional session transcript), preview, and publish to a secret GitHub gist for triage or self-debug via /brainstorm <gist-url> | [--full] |
/ship-milestone | Bundle the Release Checklist + /docs --commit --full into one atomic, human-approved release commit | [M<N>] [--version X.Y.Z] [--codename "<name>"] [--summary "<text>"] |
/deps | Manage a git-tracked specs/deps.yaml manifest of sibling packages — Socratic add / edit / delete / list / sync subcommands; underpins the deps-research retrieval fork that feeds /brainstorm and /spec-write | <subcommand> [args...] |
Seven additional skills (spec-research, spec-review-audit, tdd-write-test, tdd-implement, tdd-refactor, tdd-spec-review, deps-research) are not user-invocable — they run only as context: fork children of /brainstorm, /spec-write, /spec-review, and /tdd.
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
code-reviewer | Quality / security / patterns review rubric with pass-specific contracts; invoked twice by /implement Stage B (spec compliance → code quality) |
spec-researcher | Read-only Haiku that scans specs/frs/** (active + archived) and emits a fixed-shape ≤ 25-line block of related FRs / prior decisions / reusable ACs |
tdd-test-writer | Writes failing tests for the full AC list of one FR and runs them once to confirm RED — invoked once per FR by /tdd |
tdd-implementer | Implements the minimum code to turn one AC's failing test GREEN — invoked once per AC by /tdd |
tdd-refactorer | Cleans up cross-AC duplication while keeping every test GREEN — invoked once at end of FR by /tdd |
tdd-spec-reviewer | Read-only Sonnet that traces every AC of one FR to file + test post-REFACTOR; emits a closed-schema audit block and blocks the pipeline only on missing ACs (bounded single-round auto-retry) — invoked once at end of FR by /tdd |
deps-researcher | Read-only Haiku that scans manifest-listed sibling packages' docs/ trees and emits a fixed-shape ≤ 25-line block of relevant packages + verbatim API signatures + reusable patterns — invoked by /brainstorm Step 1.5b and /spec-write § 0b step 2.5b |
dev-process-toolkit/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── marketplace.json # Marketplace catalog
├── plugins/
│ └── dev-process-toolkit/ # The plugin
│ ├── .claude-plugin/
│ │ └── plugin.json # Plugin manifest
│ ├── skills/ # 23 (16 + 7) skills (16 user-invocable + 7 internal forks)
│ ├── agents/ # 8 specialist agents (code-reviewer, spec-researcher, spec-reviewer, deps-researcher, tdd-{test-writer,implementer,refactorer,spec-reviewer})
│ ├── adapters/ # 3 tracker adapters (linear, jira, _template) + _shared helpers
│ ├── templates/ # CLAUDE.md and spec templates
│ ├── docs/ # Methodology and guides
│ ├── tests/ # Pattern 9 regression fixture + capture/verify scripts + MCP/project fixtures
│ └── examples/ # Stack-specific configs
├── CLAUDE.md
├── README.md
└── LICENSE
See CHANGELOG.md for the full release history. Latest: v2.32.0 — "Parity" (M88 promotes Kotlin to a first-class stack at parity with Flutter/Python/TypeScript — examples/kotlin/ configs, /setup auto-detection + a detekt scaffold-verify branch, a stacks.kotlin permissions key, and a new kotlin-detekt-configured gate probe (#60) — and documents bun as a universal toolkit prerequisite in a new README ## Prerequisites section.)
Three layers prevent AI agents from going off the rails:
The key insight: deterministic checks always override LLM judgment. A failing test means "fix it," not "maybe it's fine."
plugins/dev-process-toolkit/examples/python/ (not dogfooded in production by the plugin author, but the /setup detection path and example config are maintained alongside the TypeScript and Flutter examples).plugins/dev-process-toolkit/examples/kotlin/ (not dogfooded in production by the plugin author, but the /setup detection path and example config are maintained alongside the TypeScript and Flutter examples).plugins/dev-process-toolkit/docs/sdd-methodology.md — What SDD is and how it worksplugins/dev-process-toolkit/docs/skill-anatomy.md — How Claude Code skills workplugins/dev-process-toolkit/docs/adaptation-guide.md — Reference for customizing skills and configuration after /setupplugins/dev-process-toolkit/docs/patterns.md — 25 proven patterns + anti-patternsplugins/dev-process-toolkit/docs/layout-reference.md — spec layout behavioral contract (file-per-FR keyed by tracker ID / short-ULID; ULID in frontmatter; Provider interface; skill integration map)Claude Code official docs: https://code.claude.com/docs/en
Visual, example-driven guide with copy-paste CLAUDE.md templates for quick setup
ATLAS: a senior-engineer layer for Claude Code. Explore with wireframes & prototypes, clarify the essentials, capture it
Production-tested CLAUDE.md and rules that make Claude Code write better code and more human text. Anti-AI-slop writing
CLAUDE.md + PROGRESS.md templates for AI-assisted productivity