A community-driven registry for the Claude Code ecosystem. Not affiliated with Anthropic.
Are you the author? Sign in to claim
EMILIA Protocol — Trust enforcement for high-risk actions. Open protocol for pre-action binding, policy-bound verificati
A named human's signed "yes" before an AI agent does anything irreversible — with a receipt anyone can verify offline.
Try it in one line (Claude / Cursor / Cline):
npx -y @emilia-protocol/mcp-server
90-second demo · Quickstart · Agent code walkthrough · Discord
EMILIA Protocol (EP) is a protocol-grade trust substrate for high-risk action enforcement.
EP does not stop at identity. It verifies whether a specific actor, operating under a specific authority context, should be allowed to perform a specific high-risk action under a specific policy, exactly once, with replay resistance and durable event traceability.
EP enforces trust before high-risk action.
EP is not a generic identity platform, not a wallet, and not a social reputation layer. It is protocol infrastructure for binding actor identity, authority, policy, and exact action context before execution.
EP Core consists of three interoperable objects:
EP Extensions add stronger enforcement for high-risk workflows. The most important extension is Handshake, which binds actor identity, authority, policy, exact action context, nonce, expiry, and one-time consumption into a pre-action authorization flow.
When policy requires named human ownership, EP can also require Accountable Signoff before execution.
The protocol is open. Managed policy, verification, signoff orchestration, monitoring, evidence tooling, and sector-specific packs are optional product layers built on top.
Eye observes. Handshake verifies. Signoff owns. Commit seals.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Automated tests | 3,430 across 129 files |
| TLA+ safety properties | 20 verified (T1–T20) — TLC 2.19, 2026-04-02 — see formal/PROOF_STATUS.md. 6 additional EP-IX properties (T21–T26) specified, model run pending. |
| Alloy relational assertions | 32 facts, 15 assertions — Verified (Alloy 6.1.0, 2026-04-02) |
| Red team cases | 85 cataloged in docs/conformance/RED_TEAM_CASES.md |
| Security findings remediated | 31 |
| CI quality gates | See .github/workflows/ (~13 workflows) |
| Full 7-step signoff chain | Proven end-to-end under load |
| Handshake create p95 | 575ms at 50 VUs (per docs/operations/PERFORMANCE_PROOF.md) |
See Performance Proof | Operating Envelope | Security Policy | Audit Methodology | API Compatibility Policy
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Spec version | EP-CORE-v1.0 |
| Conformance test | 7/7 required checks PASS |
| Standalone verify | npm install @emilia-protocol/verify — zero deps, Apache-2.0 (npmjs.com) |
| Embed widget | <ep-trust-badge entity-id="..."> |
| Discovery | /.well-known/ep-trust.json + /.well-known/ep-keys.json |
| Formal models | TLA+ + Alloy |
| CodeQL | Active |
| SBOM / Provenance | Active |
EP is a three-layer system. The core is deliberately small. Everything else is either an optional extension or a product surface built on top.
A skeptical reader should be able to answer in 30 seconds: Core = the minimum interoperable standard. Extensions = stronger enforcement you opt into. Product Surfaces = tools built on top, not the protocol itself.
EP is decision infrastructure. Every serious deployment should anchor to a concrete action surface such as:
| Context | Example |
|---|---|
| Government | payment destination change, benefit redirect, operator override |
| Financial | beneficiary change, payout destination change, treasury approval |
| Enterprise | privileged production change, secrets rotation, permission escalation |
| AI / Agent | destructive tool use, autonomous irreversible action |
EP standardizes three interoperable objects:
| Object | What it is | One-line |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Receipt | A portable record of an observed event relevant to trust | What happened |
| Trust Profile | A standardized summary of observable trust state | What is known |
| Trust Decision | A policy-evaluated result with reasons and appeal path | What to do now |
If a third party can implement these three objects and interoperate, EP has a real standard.
That is the irreducible EP story.
Most systems verify who is acting. Very few verify whether this exact high-risk action should be allowed to proceed under this exact policy by this exact actor right now.
That is the gap EP closes.
Run Claude Code as an MCP server so any agent can delegate coding tasks to it
Browser automation using accessibility snapshots instead of screenshots
English-first Korean equity intelligence MCP — DART filings, foreign-holder 5%-rule flows, activist filings, KRX news. F
Unity MCP acts as a bridge between AI assistants and your Unity Editor. Give your LLM tools to manage assets, control sc
0
via CLI