Are you the author? Sign in to claim
Code quality platform for Bazel monorepos — static analyzers as aspects, SARIF, quality gates
Bazel builds your monorepo. Gavel judges it. Order in the codebase!
The quality gate for Bazel monorepos — build-graph-native, local, agent-ready.
Your monorepo builds green. That's not the same as innocent. Gavel gathers the
evidence as Bazel aspects, holds every change to the law you set in gavel.yaml,
and returns a verdict: the regression you just introduced stands charged, while a
decade of existing debt is not on trial. One verdict, handed to your CI, your
terminal, and your coding agent alike.
gavel init # open the case
gavel judge # hear it

# Homebrew — macOS & Linux
brew install gavelcode/tap/gavel
# or the install script — Linux, CI, Docker
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gavelcode/gavel/main/install.sh | sh
Prebuilt binaries for every platform are on the releases page.
Gavel needs a Bazel 8.0+ (bzlmod) workspace; verify with gavel --version.
bazel build //apps/cli/cmd/gavel
# binary at bazel-bin/apps/cli/cmd/gavel/gavel_/gavel
Every change gets its day in court.
Analyzers — golangci-lint, PMD, CPD, SpotBugs, Error Prone, Ruff, Bandit,
ESLint, Clippy — run as Bazel aspects. They see the exact source tree,
dependency graph, and toolchains Bazel already resolves; no separate scanner, no
second config to drift. SonarQube re-scans the world; Gavel looks only at the
targets the graph says changed (--affected), so a run stays fast as the
monorepo grows. Every tool, every language, normalized to one format: SARIF.
gavel.yaml is the quality gate — code, reviewed and versioned with the
repo, not clicked into a web UI. It evaluates only what you just added against a
committed baseline: new findings, coverage regressions, new architecture
violations. Adopt Gavel on ten years of debt and it blocks on today's diff,
never on the backlog.
projects:
- name: payments
pattern: "//payments/..."
tooling:
go: [golangci-lint, archtest]
quality_gate:
findings: { max_error: 0 }
coverage: { min: 80 }
architecture_violations: { max: 0 }
Every run saves a fingerprint snapshot; the next shows the delta — new, fixed, existing — plus the coverage trend. No server required.
payments/api/handler.go:42 error null check missing golangci-lint:nilerr NEW
⚖ VERDICT: FAIL — code_quality
1 new · 8 fixed · 31 existing coverage 73.5% (↑5.0%) architecture PASS
Coding agents write code they can't see the consequences of — a lint regression,
a coverage drop, a layering violation land three commits later in CI. gavel mcp
starts a Model Context Protocol server that
exposes judge, lint_file, findings, coverage, and arch as tools. Point
Claude Code, Cursor, or Zed at it and the agent checks its own work against the
same Bazel-aware gate as it writes — a quality conscience, inline.
For editors and dashboards, gavel watch re-analyzes on every save and emits a
JSONL event stream. Both run fully local — no server, no network.
| SonarQube | Gavel | |
|---|---|---|
| Build-graph awareness | None | Bazel aspects understand target dependencies |
| Monorepo model | One project, or a branch per project | Hierarchical: per-package, per-project, whole repo |
| Analysis scope | Full scan or file diff | Bazel-aware: changed files + affected targets |
| Local workflow | Server round-trip | Fully local, zero network |
| Coding-agent / editor loop | — | MCP server + watch event stream |
| Quality gate | Web-UI config | Code (gavel.yaml), versioned with the repo |
| Progress tracking | Server-backed | Local fingerprint snapshots, no infrastructure |
| Footprint | Java server + database + scanner | One static Go binary, runs inside Bazel |
SonarQube is a mature platform with fifteen years of rules behind it, and Gavel isn't trying to replace it. Gavel answers a question SonarQube structurally can't: which packages of my Bazel monorepo are healthy, and did this change make one of them worse — where the build graph is the unit of analysis and the inner loop is where quality is actually won.
Already running aspect's rules_lint? Keep it. Gavel reads the SARIF it drops in
bazel-bin/(gavel judge --findings-source=rules_lint) and turns those reports into a gate — baseline delta, coverage, architecture, verdict — the layer rules_lint deliberately leaves to you.
Alpha — v0.1.0. Under active development; APIs and config formats may change. Gavel gates its own repository on every commit — it is its own first user.
Working today:
gavel init — scaffold config + Bazel integrationgavel judge — analyze, evaluate the gate, show findings and the deltagavel judge --project <name> · --quick · --summary · --affected — scope and shape the rungavel judge --absolute — evaluate all findings (release gates, nightly)gavel judge --json · --output-sarif report.sarif — structured output for CI, IDEs, GitHub Code Scanninggavel judge --server URL --token TOKEN — shared team baseline: fetch and submitgavel watch — re-analyze on change, emitting a JSONL event streamgavel mcp — Model Context Protocol server for editor / agent integrationgavel validate — check Bazel integration healthgavel.yaml and architecture.yml, field by fieldgavel-serverIssues and pull requests are welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md and our Code of Conduct. Security reports go through SECURITY.md.
Run Claude Code as an MCP server so any agent can delegate coding tasks to it
Browser automation using accessibility snapshots instead of screenshots
Google's universal MCP server supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, and 10+ databases
Official GitHub integration for repos, issues, PRs, and CI/CD workflows