Are you the author? Sign in to claim
The API-change deploy gate for AI coding agents (MCP server): is it safe to ship this API change to my consumers? Read-o
The API-change deploy gate for AI coding agents. Ask "is it safe to ship this API change to my consumers?" right inside Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients — and catch breaking changes before they reach your consumers.
It's a thin adapter over the SpecShield backend. Every tool is read-only / analyze-only — it never modifies your code.
Why not just diff specs? Plenty of tools (including free ones) list breaking changes. SpecShield's job is the decision: can I deploy this? — the deploy gate is the hero tool here.
⚙️ In CI/CD instead of an agent? The
specshieldCLI runs the same breaking-change andcan-i-deploychecks in your pipeline (GitHub Action, exit codes). Same job, two entry points: this server for AI agents, the CLI for CI/CD.
| # | Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | is_change_safe ⭐ | Is this change safe to merge/deploy? Will it break consumers? (safeToMerge + risk + blocking reasons) |
| 2 | explain_breaking_changes | What breaks, developer & consumer impact, suggested migration |
| 3 | generate_migration_guide | Migration guide (markdown) + safe rollout steps |
| 4 | generate_release_notes | Release notes for developer / customer / internal |
| 5 | compare_specs | The raw diff (breaking / additions / modifications / warnings) + risk score |
| 6 | run_governance_review 🔒 | API governance ruleset beyond breaking changes (missing operationId, error responses, security scheme, pagination, versioning…) → located findings + suggested fixes. Paid (Team+) |
Tools 1–5 accept specs inline (baseSpecContent / targetSpecContent) or by path
(baseSpecPath / targetSpecPath). run_governance_review reviews a single spec
(specContent / specPath).
🔒 run_governance_review is a paid feature — a FREE API key returns a
payment_required error. Upgrade at specshield.io/pricing.
Full setup, verification & troubleshooting: docs/mcp-server-setup.md.
Requires Node.js ≥ 20 and a SpecShield API key (from specshield.io/account).
npx -y specshield-mcp-server
claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"specshield": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "specshield-mcp-server"],
"env": { "SPECSHIELD_API_KEY": "ss_your_key_here" }
}
}
}
claude mcp add specshield --env SPECSHIELD_API_KEY=ss_your_key_here -- npx -y specshield-mcp-server
~/.cursor/mcp.json (or the project .cursor/mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"specshield": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "specshield-mcp-server"],
"env": { "SPECSHIELD_API_KEY": "ss_your_key_here" }
}
}
}
| Env var | Required | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
SPECSHIELD_API_KEY | yes | — | Your SpecShield API key. Store it as a secret; never commit it. |
SPECSHIELD_API_URL | no | https://api.specshield.io | Backend base URL (override for self-hosted/staging). |
SPECSHIELD_TIMEOUT_MS | no | 30000 | Per-request timeout. |
SPECSHIELD_LOG_LEVEL | no | info | debug | info | warn | error (logs go to stderr). |
openapi.yaml — is it safe to ship this API change to my consumers?"v1.yaml and v2.yaml and tell me if I can deploy, and why not."X-Api-Key header to your configured backend.npm install
npm run build # tsc → dist/
npm test # vitest (no network)
npm run lint
npm run smoke # boots the server against a stubbed backend and lists tools
npm start # run the built server over stdio
MIT © SpecShield Software Private Limited
Run Claude Code as an MCP server so any agent can delegate coding tasks to it
Browser automation using accessibility snapshots instead of screenshots
Google's universal MCP server supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, and 10+ databases
Official GitHub integration for repos, issues, PRs, and CI/CD workflows