A community-driven registry for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline & more. Not affiliated with Anthropic.
Are you the author? Sign in to claim
strategy-mcp is an open source MCP server that exposes professional-grade product strategy frameworks as structured tool
Professional-grade product strategy frameworks as MCP tools.
Give any MCP-compatible AI assistant — Claude Code, Cursor, Cline — instant access to 12 structured strategy frameworks. Not templates. Not prompts. Actual tools that accept your inputs, apply the framework, show the reasoning, and return specific next steps.
AI tools are great at generating content. They're inconsistent at applying structured thinking.
strategy-mcp is the product management layer that's been missing from the AI toolkit. Every framework a PM reaches for — RICE scoring, Jobs-to-be-Done, competitive positioning, OKR generation — encoded as a tool your AI can use natively.
Each tool returns:
Built by Sohaib Thiab — former CPO, now building AI products in public.
strategy-mcp is published on PyPI — install it with a single command.
claude mcp add strategy-mcp -- uv run --with strategy-mcp python server.py
Add to your Cursor MCP settings (.cursor/mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"strategy-mcp": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--with", "strategy-mcp", "python", "server.py"]
}
}
}
Add to your Cline MCP settings:
{
"mcpServers": {
"strategy-mcp": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "--with", "strategy-mcp", "python", "server.py"]
}
}
}
pip install strategy-mcp
git clone https://github.com/sohaibt/strategy-mcp.git
cd strategy-mcp
uv run python server.py
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
rice_score | Score a feature using Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort. Returns a calculated score, priority tier, and factor-by-factor analysis. |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
assumption_map | Map assumptions into a 2x2 matrix of confidence vs. impact. Identifies your riskiest bets and what to test first. |
jobs_to_be_done | Analyze a feature through the JTBD lens — job statement, functional/emotional/social dimensions, hiring criteria, switching barriers. |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
competitive_position | Map your product and competitors on a 2-axis chart. Identifies nearest threats, white space, and differentiation opportunities. |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
business_model_review | Assess a business model using the Business Model Canvas. Reviews all 9 components for clarity, gaps, and coherence. |
tam_sam_som | Estimate addressable market tiers with top-down + bottom-up cross-validation. Includes sanity checks and key assumptions. |
pricing_strategy | Analyze pricing against positioning and the competitive landscape. Recommends a model, price range, and flags risks. |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
okr_generator | Generate well-formed OKRs from a strategic goal. Creates an inspirational objective with 3-5 measurable key results. |
initiative_scoper | Break a strategic goal into scoped initiatives with dependencies, effort estimates, critical path, and execution sequence. |
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
wardley_assessment | Assess where components sit on the evolution axis (Genesis → Commodity). Recommends build vs. buy for each. |
hypothesis_builder | Transform assumptions into structured, testable hypotheses with success metrics, test methods, and risk assessment. |
decision_log_entry | Structure a product decision for archiving — captures context, alternatives, rationale, and revisit conditions. |
Ask your AI assistant:
"Score our new AI onboarding feature using RICE. It reaches about 5,000 users per quarter, high impact, we're 80% confident, and it'll take 2 person-months."
What you get back:
{
"feature_name": "AI Onboarding Feature",
"rice_score": 2000.0,
"priority_tier": "Critical",
"score_breakdown": "RICE = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort\n = (5,000 x 1 x 0.8) / 2\n = 2,000.0",
"analysis": "**AI Onboarding Feature** scores **2,000.0** — classified as **Critical** priority.\n\n- **Reach is moderate** (5,000 users/quarter)\n- **Impact is medium** (1x) per user affected.\n- **Confidence is high** (80%)\n- **Effort is moderate** (2 person-months)",
"next_steps": [
"Prioritize AI Onboarding Feature in the next sprint/cycle — the score supports it.",
"Define success metrics before building so you can validate the impact estimate post-launch.",
"Stack-rank this against your top 5 backlog items using the same RICE framework for consistency."
],
"confidence": "High",
"confidence_rationale": "The input estimates appear data-informed (high confidence %, meaningful reach).",
"pressure_test_questions": [
"Is the reach estimate (5,000 users/quarter) based on actual data or a gut feeling?",
"Would the impact really be medium? What's the evidence from user research?",
"Are there hidden dependencies that could inflate the 2-month effort estimate?"
]
}
Every tool follows this same structure: analysis + next steps + confidence + pressure-test questions.
"Review the business model for my AI analytics startup. We target mid-market SaaS companies, our value prop is real-time anomaly detection..."
The tool assesses all 9 BMC components, rates each as Strong/Adequate/Weak/Missing, identifies critical gaps, evaluates coherence between components, and tells you exactly what to fix first.
"I have three assumptions about my product. Turn them into testable hypotheses."
Each assumption becomes a structured hypothesis with: independent/dependent variables, success metric, success threshold, suggested test method, estimated duration, and risk assessment. Hypotheses are prioritized by risk level — test the scariest ones first.
strategy-mcp is a stateless MCP server built with FastMCP. Each tool:
All analysis is done locally using your inputs + the framework logic. No data leaves your machine. No API keys required.
Your AI Assistant (Claude/Cursor/Cline)
│
▼
MCP Protocol
│
▼
strategy-mcp server (FastMCP)
│
├── tools/prioritization.py → RICE scoring
├── tools/discovery.py → Assumption map, JTBD
├── tools/positioning.py → Competitive positioning
├── tools/business_model.py → BMC, TAM/SAM/SOM, Pricing
├── tools/execution.py → OKR generator, Initiative scoper
├── tools/advanced.py → Wardley assessment, Hypothesis builder
└── tools/governance.py → Decision log
uv run pytest tests/ -v
All 12 tools have happy-path and edge-case tests (24 tests total).
strategy-mcp/
├── server.py # MCP server entry point
├── tools/
│ ├── prioritization.py # RICE score
│ ├── discovery.py # Assumption map, JTBD
│ ├── positioning.py # Competitive positioning
│ ├── business_model.py # BMC, TAM/SAM/SOM, Pricing
│ ├── execution.py # OKR generator, Initiative scoper
│ ├── advanced.py # Wardley assessment, Hypothesis builder
│ └── governance.py # Decision log
├── schemas/
│ └── models.py # Pydantic models for all inputs/outputs
├── tests/
│ └── test_tools.py # 24 tests across all 12 tools
└── pyproject.toml
Contributions welcome! Some ways to help:
Please open an issue before submitting large PRs so we can discuss the approach.
MIT — use it however you want.
Sohaib Thiab — Former CPO, now building AI products in public.
Want connected strategy execution? GetVelocity.ai takes these frameworks further — connecting your OKRs to Jira, Linear, and ClickUp with AI-powered monitoring and real-time velocity tracking.
If strategy-mcp saves you a bad decision, it's done its job.
mcp-language-server gives MCP enabled clients access semantic tools like get definition, references, rename, and diagnos
MCP server integration for DaVinci Resolve Studio
Run Claude Code as an MCP server so any agent can delegate coding tasks to it