A community-driven registry for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline & more. Not affiliated with Anthropic.
Are you the author? Sign in to claim
Local AI development harness for Claude Code. Fail-closed 8-gate governance, 16 skills, hooks-level enforcement.
中文 | English
"How do you let AI handle so much development with so little supervision?"
This is the answer.
wow-harness is a governance layer for Claude Code. It makes AI agents reliable enough that you can set direction, walk away, and trust the work actually lands — with review gates, completion verification, and mechanical enforcement that no amount of prompting can replicate.
Claude Code is remarkably capable. But left unsupervised, it has structural biases:
You end up supervising more than you saved in development time. The 80% it does well makes the 20% it silently drops even harder to catch.
CLAUDE.md instruction compliance: ~20%
PreToolUse hook enforcement: 100%
Instructions don't reliably change AI behavior. Mechanical constraints do.
A review agent told "don't modify files" obeys ~70% of the time. A review agent whose tool manifest doesn't list Edit/Write obeys 100% of the time — it physically can't call what isn't there.
wow-harness applies this principle everywhere: if it matters, enforce it with a hook, not a sentence.
| Without wow-harness | With wow-harness |
|---|---|
| "Did you run the tests?" → "Yes" (didn't) | Mechanical gate checks progress.json — can't fake evidence |
| AI stops mid-chat, injects completion checklist | Stop hook parses session transcript — only triggers when uncommitted writes exist |
| Review agent "helpfully" edits what it reviews | Review agent physically cannot call Edit/Write (schema-level isolation) |
| "This PR is simple, let's skip review" | Gates 2/4/6/8 mechanically require independent review — no exceptions |
| Parallel AI sessions contaminate each other | Each session's scope is isolated via its own transcript file |
| Agent drifts into unrelated fixes | Context routing injects domain-specific rules only for files being edited |
16 hooks across 7 lifecycle stages. They intercept as things happen, not after:
SessionStart → Load context, reset risk state, surface tools
PreToolUse → Block unsafe deploys, gate review agents, sanitize reads
PostToolUse → Route context on edit, detect loops, track risk
Stop → Verify completion candidate exists (transcript × git diff)
SessionEnd → Reflect, analyze traces, persist progress
Every significant change flows through gates. Even-numbered gates require independent review — not the same agent checking its own work:
G0 Problem → G1 Design → G2 Review*
→ G3 Plan → G4 Review+Lock*
→ G5 Tasks → G6 Review*
→ G7 Execute+Log → G8 Final Review*
* = Independent reviewer (separate context, read-only tools)
15 validators run on file changes: API type consistency, doc freshness, security patterns, fragment integrity, hook registration, and more. They catch drift before it compounds.
16 specialized behaviors — from architecture design (arch) to failure pattern extraction (crystal-learn) to structured bug triage (bug-triage). Skills install judgment frameworks, not rule lists, so the agent can navigate situations the skill didn't explicitly cover.
Each skill has {{PLACEHOLDER}} structural slots designed to be filled with your project's context during installation.
git clone https://github.com/NatureBlueee/wow-harness.git
cd wow-harness
python3 scripts/install/phase2_auto.py /path/to/your/project --tier drop-in
| Tier | Trust level | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| drop-in | Minimal | Installs hooks + skills as-is. Try it, see what happens. |
| adapt | Medium | Reads your README + docs, customizes skills to your project. |
| mine | Full | Reads your work transcripts, deeply adapts to your patterns. |
your-project/
├── .claude/
│ ├── settings.json # Hook registrations (appends, won't clobber)
│ ├── skills/ # 16 agent behavior definitions
│ └── rules/ # Path-scoped context (auto-loaded by file path)
├── scripts/
│ ├── hooks/ # 16 lifecycle hooks
│ └── checks/ # 15 automated validators
└── CLAUDE.md # Governance guide (generated, yours to edit)
The installer is idempotent — run it twice, get the same result.
{{PLACEHOLDER}} with meta-instructions (what to put, why it matters, how to discover it), not empty fields you forget to fill.Born from 6 months of production use on Towow, an agent collaboration protocol. The governance layer kept proving independently valuable — every AI-assisted project needs it, not just ours. So we extracted it.
The hooks, gates, and isolation patterns were designed by getting burned first, then building the guard. Every rule in this system exists because an AI agent found a creative way to not follow the previous rule.
MIT
MCP server plugin for voice input and output in Claude Code
Intelligent prompt improver hook for Claude Code. Type vibes, ship precision.
Give Claude Code memory that evolves with your codebase via hooks and LLM-compiled knowledge
Blocks dangerous git and shell commands from being executed by AI coding agents